Tuesday, 25 January 2011


'Therefore using only ELISA as a screening test or for diagnosing Lyme borreliosis seems debatable.'

Well that is an understatement, but a step in the right direction, if only our Health Authorities would listen.

Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2011 Jan 22. [Epub ahead of print]

Serodiagnosis of Borreliosis: Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Immunoblotting.

Wojciechowska-Koszko I, Mączyńska I, Szych Z, Giedrys-Kalemba S.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland, IwonaKoszko@interia.pl.
Lyme disease is an infectious, multi-system, tick-borne disease caused by genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria sensu lato, characterized by remarkable heterogeneity. In this situation choosing an optimal antigen array for diagnostic tests seems problematic. The serological tests for borrelia routinely done in laboratories often produce ambiguous results, which makes a proper diagnosis rather complicated and thus delays the implementation of an appropriate treatment regimen. Thirty-seven outpatients and eight inpatients with suspected borreliosis diagnosis hospitalized at the Clinics of the Pomeranian Medical University (Szczecin, Poland), participated in the study. In order to detect the antibodies against Borrelia sensu lato three kinds of serological tests were used: indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and immunoblot. The IIFA and immunoblot tests conducted on 45 patients (100%) produced positive results for both the IgM and IgG antibody types. In the case of ELISA, positive or borderline results were observed in only 24 patients (53.3%). The immunoblot test for IgM most frequently detected antibodies against the outer surface protein C (OspC) antigen (p25), and, in the case of IgG, against the recombinant variable surface antigen (VlsE). The IIFA screening test used for diagnosing Lyme borreliosis produced the highest percentage of positive results, which were then confirmed by immunoblot, but not by ELISA. Therefore using only ELISA as a screening test or for diagnosing Lyme borreliosis seems debatable.
PMID: 21258869 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


In fact there has been a considerable body of research over many years showing the problems over testing for Lyme Disease and not just the Elisa but also the Western Blot.

See Steven Phillips presentation to the IDSA review panel 25 studies on seronegativity and persistent infection. here

Interestingly Steven Phillips highlights on 18 occasions were the authors of the discredited IDSA Lyme Disease guidelines were involved in those studies but failed to include in their guidelines. When asked why by the Chairwoman at the end on the hearing Steere replies that he has changed his opinion. Yes OPINION is what is driving the IDSA guidelines for Lyme disease.

The recent Institute of Medicine workshop on the state of the science for Lyme Disease and other Tick borne diseases leaves the listener in no doubt that testing is just not reliable in any of these illnesses and that for some long courses of treatment are needed to deal with some chronic tick borne diseases.

The Video casts are still available to watch here

One of the most significant presentations was that of Ben Luft who recently Sequenced the Genome for Borrelia here he points out the difficulties over testing because of the various different strains of Borrelia but he also emphasises that it is a relapsing illness. You can read a phonetic translation of his presentation here

How many thousands of patients have had negative test results for Lyme Disease and been told by their doctors they don't have Lyme Disease, when in reality they do but the poor testing has missed the result.

Interestingly Doctors are not warned about the possible seronegative results even though here in the UK the makers of those test kits Trinity Biotech say-

'Negative results (either first or second-tier) should not be used to exclude Lyme disease.'

How many patients with Fibromyalgia, ME/CFS, Arthrits, Muscle weakness, Polymyalgia Rheumatica, Neurological illnesses like Multiple Sclerosis, Motor Neurons, Parkinson's and many more health problems are properly assessed for Lyme Disease or other tick borne diseases?

No comments:

Post a Comment