tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3707770726760676731.post94091670784293807..comments2024-02-25T19:33:19.408+00:00Comments on LOOKING AT LYME DISEASE - MSIDS: THE LANCET ALLOWS A VOICE ON CHRONIC LYME DISEASEJoannehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12905137222286141548noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3707770726760676731.post-23672897173648117312012-04-30T14:10:10.942+01:002012-04-30T14:10:10.942+01:00Who knows perhaps they did - it took about 9 month...Who knows perhaps they did - it took about 9 months I am told to publish the three responses and then only once Auwaeter et al had produced a reply - Auwaeter et al seemed to have struggled to find much that is helpful and after all the Liverpool study was in itself rather subjective and inconclusive - there is no test that can rule out Lyme Disease but plenty of problems with the tests they would have used.Joannehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12905137222286141548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3707770726760676731.post-33991322630793809932012-04-29T21:46:58.746+01:002012-04-29T21:46:58.746+01:00I am glad The Lancet gave people an opportunity to...I am glad The Lancet gave people an opportunity to post rebuttals to the original letter by Auwaerter et al. What I find unusual is that someone from ILADS didn't come forward to offer their own rebuttal. It would be beneficial if they responded with scientific evidence to support their own claims and point out where Auwaerter et al are flawed.Camp Otherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10224408965529778101noreply@blogger.com